Health Canada’s nutrition label reform: Why ask consumers for comments?

Notice the absence of Added Sugars

Notice the absence of the Added Sugars line

This past Friday, the Honourable Rona Ambrose, Minister of Health, unveiled several initiatives including more information on the proposed changes to nutritional labelling regulations. There were indeed some positive proposals that made it from the first stage of nutrition labelling reform announced last year (including those such as standardized serving sizes and a change in ingredient list labelling).  But on the whole, Health Canada has once again shown that the financial health of food companies comes before that physical health of Canadians.

Last summer after releasing their plans, Health Canada wanted to know what you thought about their proposed changes to the Nutrition Facts table. Well, it’s almost a year later and further on in the process, they’re once again asking for comments. Too bad, though, because it seems that those offered by ordinary Canadians don’t really hold much weight. But don’t be insulted. They also don’t seem to care about what health professionals think either.

I’m talking about the issue of  “Added Sugars” being included on the Nutrition Facts table (NFt).  In the last set of proposals, the government was set to include a line in the NFt which would tell shoppers just how much added sugar is in a product.

It was a concept welcomed by many. The Added Sugars line would have allowed consumers to separate the amount of natural sugars in foods such as dairy products like yogurt  or cereal versus those sugars added.  I’m sure, though, the food industry wasn’t happy with the idea.

They no longer need to worry as Health Canada has dropped this from the proposed plan. On a positive note, they are still including the plan to group all sugars together on the ingredient list – at least for now.

Currently, all sugar-based ingredients added directly to a food are listed separately in the list of ingredients and in descending order based on their proportion by weight to the food. Health Canada is proposing that all ingredients that are a type of sugar (for example: sugar, glucose-fructose, honey, fancy molasses) be grouped in brackets after the common name “Sugars” and be placed in the list based on the total amount of the sugar-based ingredients to the food as illustrated below.
NutriitonLabel-comparison
While this is helpful, without the Added Sugar line, you  may nevertheless need to be food chemist or biologist to figure out the added sugar content in foods such as cereals and yogurts.  They are also still planning on putting a  % Daily Value  (% DV)  for total sugars on the panel. This will include both natural and added sugars.  Nutrition experts were calling for a % DV to be listed beside the Added Sugar line in keeping with the World Health Organization’s recommendation to reduce the amount of added sugars consumed.  With the % DV for totals sugars,   in essence, Health Canada  may be discouraging the use of packaged foods with a high natural sugar content – dairy products such as milk and yogurts or frozen fruits, for example.  But these foods also deliver an assortment of nutrients together with the natural sugar.

But Health Canada says there’s another way around this. They propose you use the % Daily Value on the label to guide you as they state that any food with a % DV higher than 15 % likely has a lot of added sugar.  So using this reasoning, Health Canada is suggesting we avoid a product such as frozen unsweetened mango pieces as their % DV for Total Sugars  would be listed as over 20 %.

So much for using this tool to make healthy eating choices.

I will share  more of my thoughts with you about these proposals over the next short while. But in the meantime,  the next step of the process is for the proposals to be published in the government document, Canada Gazette, Part I consultation.  Health Canada is inviting comments on their proposals via writing by provide August 26, 2015.

You can submit comments  by fax at 613-941-7104 or by email. Or you can write to:
Health Canada
Office of Legislative and Regulatory Modernization
Policy, Planning and International Affairs Directorate
Address locator: 3105A
1600 Scott Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9
l
What are your thoughts about what Health Canada is proposing? Please share in the comment list below.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Categories: Nutrition News, Rosie's Rants

Author:Rosie Schwartz

Rosie Schwartz is a Toronto-based consulting dietitian and writer.

Get Enlightened Eater in your inbox

Subscribe to get the latest nutrition news, fresh recipes and more!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Health Canada's Proposed Nutrition Labels Not Good Enough - Vincci Tsui, RD - June 17, 2015

    […] join other health professionals in arguing that removing the added sugar from the Nutrition Facts table and setting an arbitrary […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: